January 22, 2026
Comments Off on Building a Voice AI Agent with Policy Guardrails Using Twilio, Pipecat, and LangGraph

If your voice AI system can touch real systems or trigger actions with business consequences, your approach to AI agent tool calling security matters. When voice AI agents can modify customer data, trigger escalations, update ticketing systems, or execute workflows—especially for customer service in regulated industries like healthcare, finance, and telecommunications—you need to separate AI reasoning from execution authority through explicit policy guardrails and authorization patterns.

This guide walks us through building a minimal, but realistic, implementation of a policy-aware customer support voice AI agent using Twilio for SIP / PSTN telephony, Pipecat by Daily for real-time voice processing, and LangGraph for deterministic routing and policy enforcement. The architecture cleanly separates the three layers: LLMs interpret intent, a decision plane evaluates policy and routes requests, and actions are blocked by default. If an execution path isn’t explicitly defined, it’s unreachable.

You can view the repository here.

First, An Intentionally Boring AI Agent Demo

This video walkthrough shows an AI Agent handling a single, unremarkable request: “Why is my case still open?”

Most production AI failures do not happen on exotic edge cases. They happen on routine, high-volume requests where execution boundaries are weak such as this critical customer support scenario: answering case status inquiries and conditionally allowing escalation based on explicit decision rules.

Voice AI Agent with Policy Guardrails: Architecture

The first diagram shows how incoming calls are received via Twilio and streamed to Pipecat for real-time voice handling and conversation management. Conversational intent is extracted from the audio stream and evaluated by a background decision task using a LangGraph pipeline.

High Level Flow Diagram of the Policy-Aware AI Agent Voice AI Application (Part 1). 
High Level Flow Diagram of the Policy-Aware AI Agent Voice AI Application (Part 1). 

In the second architecture diagram below, LangGraph decision plane evaluates policies and routes decisions which determine whether any action is allowed before execution occurs.

High Level Flow Diagram of the Policy-Aware AI Agent Voice AI Application (Part 2). 
High Level Flow Diagram of the Policy-Aware AI Agent Voice AI Application (Part 1). 

The system is split into three main layers, each with a single responsibility:

Layer 1: Real-Time Voice Processing with Twilio and Pipecat

This layer is about conversation quality, not decision-making. It handles:

Layer 2: AI Reasoning and Intent Extraction

This is the LLM. 

  • Intent extraction
  • Context interpretation

Critically:

  • It is stateless
  • It has no tool access
  • It has no execution authority

The model interprets. It does not act.

Layer 3: Policy Enforcement and Controlled Execution

This is where LangGraph and tools handle:

  • Policy evaluation
  • State transitions
  • Side-effect execution (or denial)

Actions are blocked by default. If a path is not explicitly routed, it is unreachable.

LLMs interpret. Graphs decide. Voice delivers.

How LangGraph Provides AI Agent Execution Control

As shown in the diagram above, the LLM returns structured intent only, for example:

Intent: escalate

LangGraph evaluates policy:

Intent: escalate

Auth level: weak → No route → execution impossible

There is no “almost escalated.” Either the execution path exists, or it does not. This is the core difference from agent-centric workflows, where tools are callable unless guarded everywhere.

Note: LangGraph enforces execution boundaries at the application layer. In production systems, this should be complemented with infrastructure-level controls (IAM, network isolation, service permissions) so that even misconfigured graphs cannot bypass execution limits.

Running the Policy-Aware Voice AI Agent Demo

The fastest way to run the demo is with Docker Compose:

git clone https://github.com/agonza1/policy-aware-voice-ai-customer-support
cd policy-aware-voice-ai-customer-support
cp env.example .env
# add your credentials to .env file
docker compose up

Expose the service (for example with ngrok), configure the Twilio webhook, and call the number.

No database or persistent storage is required. Detailed documentation can be found in the project Readme.

Building Production Voice AI Agents with Policy Guardrails

This demo shows how to build voice AI agents with explicit execution boundaries by separating voice interaction, AI reasoning, and policy-based control.

Moving this pattern to production requires extending it to handle your specific workflows, authorization rules, and system integration requirements.

At WebRTC.ventures, we help teams build production-ready voice AI systems for industries that include finance, education, healthcare, and telecom. We specialize in real-time SIP/WebRTC architecture, secure AI agent integration, and moving from proof-of-concept to production deployment.

If you want help turning a PoC like this into a production system, or simply building a PoC to validate your concept, contact our team today.

Further reading:

Recent Blog Posts